For the course of exactly 13 hours I monitored the media I took in from 7:00am to 8:00pm. Initially I thought it to be nearly impossible due to the overwhelming amount of mass media that surrounds me everyday, yet somehow I managed to keep a record of these.
7am to 8:30am
Twitter. Through twitter I was linked to the ACTA Bill and the ACTA petition website.
Tumblr: images and information about the ACTA Bill and its effects.
8:30am to 12pm
iPod Music (on the way to school)
Youtube.com- Matrix clip where persons analysed the movie in terms of post modernism
- Clip of the Matrix movie
- US Campaign of the Gulf War: Use of technology in air warfare
12pm to 5pm
Music on iPod once again
Facebook.com-Various comedic images
Twitter.com
The Huffington Post- "Elinor Sauerwein, 96-Year-Old Millionaire, Lived Poor And Quietly Donated $1.7 Million"
RT.com- A news story on how the US arrested someone over threatening twitter posts
Tumblr.com- religious posts.
- Image and story of a Thai male who married his dead female lover.
5pm to 7pm
iPod music again
Radio playing music
Billboard advertisement
Throughout this entire exercise, what was observed was the lack of local media consumed within the twelve hour period. All of the media mentioned within this post originates mainly from the United States, this is especially so with the news stories.
In terms of the news stories consumed especially the one which reported on the person that got arrested due to twitter messages which threatened the United States Government, one could view this as a way of RT.com displaying to its readers the control that the United States government has over internet services and it also shows the fact that the government may in fact be monitoring and tracking things that are posted on popular social websites. Therefore it helps to reinstate some sort of control over the internet and what persons may post about.
The experience itself was quite interesting, especially since I found myself hyper sensitized to the world around me. It therefore goes to show that it is almost impossible to go any amount of time without consuming anything mass media related and honestly if I were to try I think I'd go mad.
Media,
News,
tnt,
trinidad,
trinidad and tobago
0
comments
A raid on TnT media sending out a message...
So imagine you're sitting in your office calmly and peacefully and then "blam" police enters your building with weaponry, yanking open drawers, shuffling through your papers, asking questions they have no right to and oh gorsh, seizing those precious articles that you took so long to write? Well Hey it's just another day in TnT! According to the Express Newspaper:
"A police team comprised of nine officers from the Anti-Corruption Investigation Bureau (ACIB) and led by Senior Supt Solomon Koon Koon, searched the desk of senior reporter Andre Bagoo allegedly in relation to an article written by him on December 20, 2011 about a row between Integrity Commission chairman Ken Gordon and deputy chairman Gladys Gafoor."
Thus far this action by the ACIB is being condemned not only by the public, but also by public figures who have attempted to remove themselves from the situation completely. This raid is being viewed by the public and also by myself as a direct threat to the media within Trinidad and Tobago. It instills fear and may send a message to persons in the media that nothing unfavourable should be reported or else their basic safety, privacy and the confidentially between journalist and his or her sources are threatened. The content is also threatened as journalists may not feel the need to express freedom of thought and to expose issues, especially those relating to government issues, for fear of being harassed and later silenced. What really gives the right, for this Anti-Corruption Investigation Bureau to blatantly invade someone's privacy and condemn someone for doing their duty? Ironically enough doesn't this raid make their actions seem corrupt in the end?
Ha, well yes. People of the media, it is time to go back to the days of writing under pseudo names for protection of yourself and for protection of your sources. After all, no one wants to get raided....
"A police team comprised of nine officers from the Anti-Corruption Investigation Bureau (ACIB) and led by Senior Supt Solomon Koon Koon, searched the desk of senior reporter Andre Bagoo allegedly in relation to an article written by him on December 20, 2011 about a row between Integrity Commission chairman Ken Gordon and deputy chairman Gladys Gafoor."
Thus far this action by the ACIB is being condemned not only by the public, but also by public figures who have attempted to remove themselves from the situation completely. This raid is being viewed by the public and also by myself as a direct threat to the media within Trinidad and Tobago. It instills fear and may send a message to persons in the media that nothing unfavourable should be reported or else their basic safety, privacy and the confidentially between journalist and his or her sources are threatened. The content is also threatened as journalists may not feel the need to express freedom of thought and to expose issues, especially those relating to government issues, for fear of being harassed and later silenced. What really gives the right, for this Anti-Corruption Investigation Bureau to blatantly invade someone's privacy and condemn someone for doing their duty? Ironically enough doesn't this raid make their actions seem corrupt in the end?
Ha, well yes. People of the media, it is time to go back to the days of writing under pseudo names for protection of yourself and for protection of your sources. After all, no one wants to get raided....
Friday, 3 February 2012
censorship,
Google,
Media,
News,
twitter
0
comments
Google to Censor Blogs.....
Google has followed in the steps of Twitter and will take steps to censor its blogging service, Blogger. According to the article on RT.com (http://rt.com/usa/news/google-starts-censoring-blogs-375/) Google will censor messages on blogs based on country restrictions in order to comply with the country's local laws. This could be seen as a method for Google to protect themselves from various lawsuits but it could also be seen as government censorship from various countries.
The internet is seen as a powerful tool for social action and protest and with the censorship of social media such as Twitter and Blogger, one could see this as an attempt of the governments of the world to hinder social action, protest and free speech. This could be applied to the Marxist theory where one could view this as the elite attempting to protect their established position in society by crippling tools that facilitate social change. As seen with the revolution in Egypt and the on going Occupy Wall Street Protests, social media has become a huge driving force in expression on various opinions and in organizing rallies and protest. However with these services being regulated by government laws and being blocked due to a country's local laws, action against the larger powers are hindered. Questions arise when I contemplate this coming change...What does Google determine as being a violation of a country's local laws? If non violent movements are seen as violating a government's law, will they be shushed and blocked from the public's views in an attempt to stop these movements all together? Can this itself be viewed as Google's partnership with powerful Government powers to hinder free speech on the internet?
The internet is seen as a powerful tool for social action and protest and with the censorship of social media such as Twitter and Blogger, one could see this as an attempt of the governments of the world to hinder social action, protest and free speech. This could be applied to the Marxist theory where one could view this as the elite attempting to protect their established position in society by crippling tools that facilitate social change. As seen with the revolution in Egypt and the on going Occupy Wall Street Protests, social media has become a huge driving force in expression on various opinions and in organizing rallies and protest. However with these services being regulated by government laws and being blocked due to a country's local laws, action against the larger powers are hindered. Questions arise when I contemplate this coming change...What does Google determine as being a violation of a country's local laws? If non violent movements are seen as violating a government's law, will they be shushed and blocked from the public's views in an attempt to stop these movements all together? Can this itself be viewed as Google's partnership with powerful Government powers to hinder free speech on the internet?
Image from: Info Carnivore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)